21 · Interview Preparation
Question sets with model answers for roles that build, design or secure systems on Claude and other large language
models: AI engineer, solution architect and AI security engineer. Everything here is original; none of it
comes from, or reconstructs, any certification exam.
Question sets
| File |
Questions |
Best for |
| Conceptual questions |
30 |
LLM fundamentals, prompting, context engineering, the API, tools, MCP, RAG, agents, evaluation |
| System design questions |
26 |
Whiteboard prompts with clarifying questions, architecture, trade-offs and what interviewers look for |
| Security questions |
28 |
Threat modelling, prompt injection, agent permissions, MCP, data protection, governance, incidents |
| Stakeholder and behavioural |
26 |
Discovery, communicating trade-offs, delivery, leadership, ethics (STAR format) |
Which sets for which role
| Role |
Focus |
Also review |
| AI engineer |
Conceptual (all), system design 1–3, 9–10, 13–14, 20 |
Claude API cheat sheet, labs |
| Solution architect |
System design (all), stakeholder (all), conceptual 11–13, 20–30 |
13 · Enterprise AI architecture, CCAR-P one-pager |
| AI security engineer |
Security (all), system design 4, 11, 12, 15, 19, 25, conceptual 17–19 |
AI security cheat sheet, 12 · AI security |
| Technical leader |
Stakeholder (all), system design 6, 11, 12, 20, 26 |
13 · Business value and ROI |
How to practise
- Answer out loud before reading the model answer. Interviews test spoken reasoning; reading answers silently
builds false confidence.
- Time yourself. Conceptual answers in about two minutes; system design in 35–45 minutes; behavioural answers in
about two minutes using STAR.
- Use your own experience. The behavioural model answers use fictional examples to show structure. Replace them
with real situations you can discuss in depth. Never invent experience.
- Build something. Interviewers probe beyond the first answer. Having run the hands-on labs
or a real-world project gives you concrete follow-up details.
- Keep facts current. Model names, prices and API features change. Answers here are dated 2026-10-24; check the
cheat sheets and official docs before an interview.
What strong candidates do
| Signal |
Example |
| Clarify before solving |
"How many documents, how often do they change, and do permissions vary per user?" |
| Prefer the simplest design |
"A routing workflow handles this; an agent adds cost without benefit here." |
| Measure |
"I'd build a 100-case eval set and compare cost per completed task." |
| Design for failure |
"Assume the model can be manipulated; enforce permissions in the tool." |
| Quantify |
"About 8,000 alerts a day, so Haiku for first-pass triage keeps cost manageable." |
| Communicate trade-offs |
"Option A is faster to ship; Option B is cheaper at scale. I recommend A for the pilot." |
Common pitfalls
- Jumping to multi-agent architectures for problems a single call can solve.
- Describing prompt instructions as security controls.
- Ignoring evaluation ("we'll test it manually").
- Quoting outdated API patterns, such as
temperature tuning or assistant prefill, which current Claude models reject.
- Overclaiming accuracy or hiding limitations from stakeholders.